On Motherhood & Sanity


Thursday, October 27, 2011

OWS' main achievement: unveiling a weak rule of law


I’ve been meaning to write about the Occupy Wall Street protest but haven’t because, well, because I feel very ambiguous about it. 

I know that if you are a liberal you are expected to support them, but I don’t feel comfortable supporting something  that defines itself in the negative.  I don’t feel comfortable doing a blanket approval, even if I agree with a lot of what they have to say. They are protesting against a system with many flaws, but also many benefits and privileges that should not be taken for granted. I don’t feel comfortable supporting a movement that criticises but does not offer constructive alternatives, we already have too many politicians doing that.


Amidst all this ambivalence I decided to go and have a look first hand. 

The first thing that shocked me is how small Zucotti park actually is. It is tiny, and that is something that the media –which has been so criticised for not covering this “historic event” properly- at no point has made evident in my view.

The second thing that called my attention is that without a doubt if you put together the photographers, media and tourists  they outnumber the actual protesters.






























The multiple signs asking for donations were equally disturbing. For what? For whom?  One such sign was quite specific:

“to take my girlfriend out for dinner”

not the most convincing politically argument.





I walked around amidst an excited atmosphere. It was a weekday, so the weekend hordes were at bay, and us curious passer bys as well as the media could go about our business fairly comfortably. Tourist busses passed by snapping away what might become a new tourist attraction.



There was a drums band, a jazz band, and towards the end a classic band set out with multiple violins and other instruments.


On that particular afternoon there were Queers Occupying Wall Street, Muslims Occupying Wall Street (about 80 of them, and the women sat in the back during the speech, which is a system that I would like to protest against myself), and once the Muslims where finished,  the praying mats were replaced by bright green foam to make the space child friendly for the Parents Occupy Wall Street sleep over.




That these three groups can coexist in such a small space is both exciting and confusing. I can’t imagine they would agree on too many things were they to actually sit down with each other. Still, they were all there, that says something.



Back at home going over the photos I continued to feel equally confused and excited. There were artists about. The idea of a street library seemed grand. The atmosphere reminded me of the many pacifist protests that I attended in my student days in Spain.



Spain has an amazing tradition of pacific demonstrations. Actually, many would be surprised to know that before OWS a similar thing took place in Spain earlier this year. On May 2011 a pacific demonstration turned into an overnight stay at Madrid’s main square, the Puerta del Sol. Their slogan was “indignados” (outraged), opposing the same system flaws.  They had sofas, libraries and  cafeterias with food donated from the restaurants around the square,  and were soon organised into action groups, both for mundane tasks such as clean up or more strategic ones such as communications with the media. The movement soon spread to other cities: Barcelona, Segovia, Valencia…

On May 27 hundreds of wounded were reported as the protestors were evacuated in order to clean the Plaza de Catalunya, sound familiar?

Eventually it was disbanded. Nothing happened. I’d heard nothing  about it since, which furthered my sense of futile  endeavour around OWS.

In trying to understand what is going on I’ve been reading around and recently discovered that the occupy puerta del sol has continued, albeit not as a protest but a civil political movement #acampadasol  which still functions through monthly open popular assemblies putting forward specific political agendas. Not sure how much of the 99% is involved but certainly seems like an interesting and efficient civil action proposal.

Although still confused generally I can say this: Zucotti park is clean, the protest is not violent, there are people of all ages, creeds and gender.



But there is another aspect  that is increasingly becoming clear as a result  of all this. The state/police reaction to what (to me) appears to be a pacific and harmless civic action  is  worrisome to the point of ridiculous (see arrest of Naomi Wolf  for … well, obeying the law).

[....that guy is never going to hear the end of it.]


More worrisome is the fact that she was diverted to another police station to keep her lawyers away, and that “homeland “ security was invoked when people asked to approach the police station.

[click on video to hear full explanation by Ms Wolf herself]


This otherwise irrelevant incident has exposed a weak rule of law that can be trampled over “a couple of middle aged couch potatoes” who haven’t broken the law.  

 I find that unveiling this trend is so far the most important achievement of the OWS movement. Ironic that this is coming out just as the Arab spring is taking place



Responsible  citizens need to keep watch, listen, read and make sure that the basic freedoms America so proudly declares as her birth right  remain intact.




4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great analysis, thanx!

Diana said...

Totally agree with your analysis of the situation.
Interesting that in America queers (outlaw in the Arab countries) can sit in the same spot with the muslin movement, and each can have their saying.
What I would like to tell the protesters is "say what you have to say, in a pacific way, but also do something to change the situation",
To me, they seem to be in a political picnic....

Scott said...

Thanks for taking the time to investigate and write this.

In addition to "a weak rule of law," what is glaring, to me, is the lack of direct enforcement of laws that protect individuals--and their property--from infringement by other individuals. E.g, if one catches an individual relieving one's self--or appropriating it in some way as to diminish it's value to it's owner-- of said property one has a natural right to preserve and protect it.
Lack of respect and/or ignorance of the law does not abrogate our duty as a law abiding society from enforcing the law.
Any less will have us descending into the morass of anarchy. That will lead directly to loss of many freedoms; which could lead us straight to totalitarianism's door. We must not allow those who struggle with good, a license, by ambiguity,ambivalance and apathy, to practice evil

Heather said...

Please email me! I have a question about your blog! :)

HeatherVonsj@gmail.com